A comprehensive side-by-side comparison of what DPR presented to the Board on March 5 versus the context, data, and history they omitted. Covers enrollment, cost recovery, the $254K gap, space usage, the 13 "alternatives," the PSMP survey, fee adjustments, and more.
Key Findings
On nearly every major claim, critical context was either absent or inconsistently represented. Enrollment declines were presented without the staffing decisions that caused them. Cost recovery figures were shared without the operational history that explains them. Alternatives were listed without basic due diligence on capacity or feasibility.